ArticleCureus2026
Effectiveness and Safety of Imatinib and Nilotinib in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: A Single-Center Study From Southern Morocco.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe prognosis of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has been revolutionized following the advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs); however, access to molecular monitoring, resistance mutation screening, and second- and third-generation TKIs remains limited in resource-constrained countries. The aim of this study was to describe the efficacy and safety profile of imatinib and nilotinib in southern Morocco.
methodsThis was a single-center, retrospective study conducted in the Clinical Hematology Department of the Mohammed VI University Hospital of Agadir over a ten-year period (2014-2024), including 80 patients with CML in the chronic or accelerated phase at diagnosis. All patients received first-line imatinib, with a switch to nilotinib in cases of resistance, relapse, or intolerance. Molecular response was assessed by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) according to the International Scale (IS), with a favorable response defined as a BCR::ABL1 transcript of ≤ 1% IS at 12 months. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
resultsAmong the 80 patients, the mean age was 47.0 ± 17.3 years, with a slight female predominance (M/F sex ratio = 0.9). The Sokal score classified 42.5% of patients as high risk. Under imatinib, a favorable molecular response at 12 months was achieved in 50% of patients, with primary resistance in the other half. As second-line therapy, nilotinib achieved a favorable response in 32.3% of the 31 treated patients. Grade ≥ 3 toxicity was observed in 12.5% of patients on imatinib and 19.4% on nilotinib, with no grade ≥ 3 cardiovascular events. After a median follow-up of 48 months, overall survival (OS) remained at 89.9% beyond 60 months, whereas event-free survival (EFS) under imatinib was shorter (median 24 months). The Sokal score was significantly associated with EFS (p = 0.007).
conclusionsOur series is notable for the young age of patients, a female predominance, and a high proportion of high-risk Sokal scores; a profile consistent with other Moroccan cohorts. Despite a high rate of imatinib resistance, likely related to the unfavorable prognostic profile, diagnostic delay, and limitations in molecular monitoring, OS remained excellent. These findings highlight the value of expanded access to second-generation TKIs as first-line therapy and to resistance mutation screening in our setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.