ReviewJTO clinical and research reports2026
Single- Versus Multi-Fraction Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Primary Lung Cancer and Pulmonary Oligometastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.
Review in JTO clinical and research reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), the standard of care for medically inoperable early-stage NSCLC, is increasingly used for pulmonary oligometastases. Optimal fractionation-single fraction (SF) versus multiple fractions (MF)-remains unclear, as existing randomized studies lack power to confirm SF noninferiority in local control. This review assessed 2-year local failure (LF) rates for SF versus MF SBRT. PubMed, Ovid Medline, and the Cochrane Library were searched. Titles and abstracts were reviewed followed by full-text review. Studies reporting LF outcomes for SF or MF SBRT in early-stage NSCLC or pulmonary metastases were included. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews guidelines were followed. Pooled estimates were calculated using fixed- and random-effects models. Primary lung cancers treated with biologically effective doses (BED
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.