ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Screening modality matters: heterogeneous nutritional status, disease complexity in children with congenital heart disease detected through active versus passive surveillance.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The global burden of malnutrition in children with congenital heart disease (CHD) is substantial, yet whether surveillance modality-the clinical pathway of initial CHD detection-influences nutritional status remains unexplored. We aim to compare nutritional status and complex CHD between children with CHD detected through active versus passive surveillance. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 9,355 children aged 0-18 years with confirmed CHD admitted to Fuwai Yunnan Hospital (China) between September 2017 and June 2025. Active surveillance was defined as detection through systematic screening (prenatal echocardiography, newborn pulse oximetry, routine health check-ups, or school-based echocardiography), while passive surveillance included symptom-driven diagnoses. Undernutrition was assessed using the WHO growth standards. Complex CHD was classified per the AHA anatomic criteria. Multivariable logistic regression examined associations of surveillance type with undernutrition and complex CHD. Results: Of 9,355 children (63.4% active, 36.6% passive), the admission undernutrition prevalence was 31.8%. Marked heterogeneity emerged across active surveillance subtypes ( Conclusion: CHD detection pathways are independently associated with nutritional status. Prenatally detected children may benefit from proactive nutritional surveillance from birth, while the expansion of school-based screening should be prioritized in underserved areas. These findings advocate for a stratified, pathway-aware malnutrition surveillance framework to optimize outcomes across the full CHD spectrum in settings with comparable screening infrastructures. While healthcare systems vary across Global South regions, this study provides a novel perspective that may inform policy discussions and guide future research in other middle-income countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.