Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42656981›Full record

ArticleQualitative research in medicine & healthcare2026

Dual perspectives: Navigating the roles of physician and ethnographer in sensitive spaces.

David Wenzel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Qualitative research in medicine & healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

David WenzelSchool of Medical Sciences, Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Positionality is central to ethnographic research because knowledge is produced through situated and relational encounters. Clinician-ethnographers occupy complex insider-outsider positions, as their professional identity may shape access, behavior, disclosure, and interpretation within the field. In this article, I explore the multiple positionalities of the physician-ethnographer in acute hospital settings and argue that professional identity should not be perceived as bias to be neutralized, but as an interpretive resource. Methods: I draw on reflexive episodes from ethnographic fieldwork examining non-invasive advanced respiratory support. I consider moments of intervention and restraint, emotional steadiness, and shifting self-presentation to examine how professional identity and authority are experienced and negotiated in practice. Results: The withholding and expression of professional authority made visible how positionality reshaped interlocutor behavior, disclosure, and the stabilization of knowledge. When I was recognized as a physician, interactions were often organized around clinical credibility and technical knowledge. When positioned as a student or outsider, interlocutors more readily articulated uncertainty, emotional labor, and the relational dimensions of care. Professional authority persisted even when unexercised, and both intervention and restraint reorganized interactions within the field. Holding multiple positionalities revealed hierarchies and moral negotiations that structure acute care. Conclusion: The physician-ethnographer's multiple positionalities should not be understood as a methodological liability to be minimized. By reframing clinician positionality as analytically generative, I demonstrate how reflexive practice can reveal the relational and symbolic organization of clinical care. Professional identity is not external to ethnographic data, but forms part of the conditions through which knowledge is produced.

Indexed as

EthnographyPalliative careReflexivity

Identifiers

PMID42656981
PMCPMC13507539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.