Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42656960›Full record

ArticlePRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)2026

Evaluating Financial Literacy Among Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Isaac Daybell, Kaitlyn Hohl, Jesse Bracamonte, Umesh Sharma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Isaac DaybellMayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ.
Kaitlyn HohlMayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ.
Jesse BracamonteDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ.
Umesh SharmaDepartment of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Financial literacy is an often-overlooked aspect of medical education. Prior research indicates that trainees frequently lack knowledge in areas such as loan repayment, retirement planning, and investing, despite reporting strong interest in financial education. Insufficient financial literacy may contribute to financial stress, burnout, and suboptimal long-term planning, highlighting the need for targeted curricula. Methods: We sent a cross-sectional survey to 446 medical students across all Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine campuses. One hundred thirteen recipients responded (25% response rate). Participants completed the abbreviated five-item Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) financial well-being scale, five previously published "Big 5" objective financial literacy questions, five investigator-developed medical training-specific knowledge questions, and seven investigator-developed self-assessed financial literacy items. We used descriptive statistics to summarize responses. We used analysis of variance, Results: Despite moderate literacy in all three measured domains, we identified gaps of knowledge regarding loan repayment and retirement planning. Students scored higher on "Big 5" items (3.91/5) than medical training-specific items (3.48/5; Conclusion: Despite moderate financial literacy on basic concepts, medical students exhibit notable gaps in knowledge regarding loan repayment and retirement planning. These findings persist across all years of training, highlighting the need for structured, early financial education to better prepare students for long-term financial security.

Indexed as

Financial LiteracyStudent Loans, RetirementUndergraduate Medical Education

Identifiers

PMID42656960
PMCPMC13508173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.