ArticleJACS Au2026
Landscape of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Function from Structure Networks.
Article in JACS Au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the therapeutic targets for an estimated 30-40% of marketed drugs. By translating the majority of the GPCR structures from the Protein Data Bank into structure graphs and analyzing over 2 million structural contacts, this study maps the landscape of GPCR classification and function. A minimal subset of just 30 specific contacts is sufficient to define the signatures of distinct receptor classes, subfamilies, types, subtypes, and functional states. These structural signatures successfully assigned classifications to the orphan GPCRs. Upon activation, class A GPCRs undergo the most radical network reorganization of all classes, retaining 0% of their state-specific contacts when transitioning from the inactive to the active state, a stark contrast to the 32-50% retention observed in classes B1, C, and F. Despite this complete contact turnover across the 7TM bundle, class A activation remains anchored by a highly conserved core of ten universal network nodes. Analysis of representative shortest communication pathways (metapaths) demonstrates that class A GPCRs rely on these highly conserved nodes to bridge structural communication between the orthosteric ligand-binding pocket and the intracellular G-protein-binding site, regardless of the functional state. Furthermore, these metapaths intersect directly with known allosteric binding sites for small allosteric modulators. G protein binding structurally reorganizes the receptor network, funneling a multitude of potential communication pathways into a few preferential routes. These pathways culminate at the highly conserved arginine residue of the E/DRY motif that acts as a key mediator of G-protein recognition, while structural divergences at the receptor-G protein interface dictate the distinctive pathways of specific G-protein signaling. The wide analysis was able to capture key aspects of the structural communication within the GPCR superfamily with implications in drug discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.