ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Effects of herbal medicines and their phytoconstituents on vagus nerve stimulation: a systematic review of
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The vagus nerve regulates autonomic, inflammatory, metabolic, and neurobehavioral functions. Although invasive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is gaining clinical relevance, herbal medicines may represent accessible, non-invasive modulators of vagal activity. However, the extent and nature of Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, Citation Information by National Institute of Informatics (CiNii), Ichushi Web, Research Information Service System (RISS), and Oriental Medicine Advanced Searching Integrated System (OASIS) databases for Results: Out of 10,342 studies screened, 75 studies met inclusion criteria. Interventions included multi-herb prescriptions (n = 22), single-herb extracts (n = 15), phytoconstituents (n = 29), phytoconstituent derivatives or formulations (n = 6), and essential oils (n = 3). Across cardiovascular, neurological, inflammatory, metabolic, and gastrointestinal models, interventions frequently increased acetylcholine (ACh) levels, choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) activity, α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (α7 nAChR) expression, and heart rate variability (HRV) indices, while decreasing acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity and pro-inflammatory cytokines (p < 0.05-0.001). Proposed mechanisms predominantly involved enhancement of cholinergic neurotransmission, suggesting the involvement of the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway. Conclusion: Evidence from preclinical studies indicates that certain herbal medicines and phytoconstituents can modulate vagus nerve activity, primarily through anti-inflammatory and autonomic regulation pathways. Rigorous mechanistic studies and translational research are needed to determine the clinical relevance of herbal-induced vagal modulation, particularly given that many preclinical studies employed parenteral administration routes that may not reflect the bioavailability and first-pass metabolism associated with oral herbal use in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.