Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42656821›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in digital health2026

Empowering AI assisted clinical drug development: tactics to address data bias, the digital divide and missing patient populations through AI and digital solutions.

Dimitris Papanicolaou, Sotirios Perdikeas, Graham B Jones

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dimitris PapanicolaouClinical Innovation, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ, United States.
Sotirios PerdikeasGlobal Clinical Operations, Novartis AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Graham B JonesClinical Innovation, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of AI methodologies in drug development holds great potential to expedite clinical trials by helping to identify patients most likely to respond favorably to a given medication. To fully harness the benefits of such algorithmic approaches to precision medicine however requires that the datasets from which such predictive analyses are performed are fully representative of the populations intended to benefit. Due to a multitude of factors, there remains extant need to increase the heterogeneity of these data including the contribution of under-represented and other absent populations. There is also a parallel need to broaden patient representation in the clinical trials themselves which are used to demonstrate efficacy of predictive models deployed. Herein we outline tactics, approaches and measures that could be deployed to drive these elements, the potential impact of such on precision medicine, and the ethical, legal, and privacy issues which need to be considered. The benefits of such would be myriad, including helping realize more fully the potential of precision medicine, which aims to pair the most appropriate care and medications with patients based on their individual phenotypic and pharmacogenomic profiles.

Indexed as

AIdata biasengagementhealth dataheterogeneitymicrotargetingsub-populations

Identifiers

PMID42656821
PMCPMC13507664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.