ReviewFrontiers in digital health2026
Empowering AI assisted clinical drug development: tactics to address data bias, the digital divide and missing patient populations through AI and digital solutions.
Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of AI methodologies in drug development holds great potential to expedite clinical trials by helping to identify patients most likely to respond favorably to a given medication. To fully harness the benefits of such algorithmic approaches to precision medicine however requires that the datasets from which such predictive analyses are performed are fully representative of the populations intended to benefit. Due to a multitude of factors, there remains extant need to increase the heterogeneity of these data including the contribution of under-represented and other absent populations. There is also a parallel need to broaden patient representation in the clinical trials themselves which are used to demonstrate efficacy of predictive models deployed. Herein we outline tactics, approaches and measures that could be deployed to drive these elements, the potential impact of such on precision medicine, and the ethical, legal, and privacy issues which need to be considered. The benefits of such would be myriad, including helping realize more fully the potential of precision medicine, which aims to pair the most appropriate care and medications with patients based on their individual phenotypic and pharmacogenomic profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.