Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42656756›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026

Deep learning algorithm enables lower limb venous thrombosis detection with CT venography.

Shanshan Shen, Haixiao Yang, Pengchao Wang, Jing Zhang, Jiahao Zhen, Tao Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shanshan ShenDepartment of Radiology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Haixiao Yang *Department of Radiology, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Pengchao Wang *Department of Radiology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Jing ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Jiahao ZhenDepartment of Radiology, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Tao LiuSchool of Economics and Management, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Lower limb computed tomography venography (CTV) has low success rates for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) diagnosis. This study applied deep learning to improve DVT identification. Methods: Our study enrolled 119 positive DVT and 40 negative DVT, 111 positive pulmonary embolism (PE) patients and 20 negative PE. Two algorithms were evaluated: Faster R-CNN trained directly on CTV images, and YOLO11-nano pre-trained on computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) then optimized on CTV via transfer learning. Three radiologists (3-5 years' experience) independently interpreted CTV images. Diagnostic performance was compared. Results: The YOLO11-nano model and Faster R-CNN achieved over 97% accuracy and sensitivity in diagnosing PE. Compared to the three radiologists in diagnosing DVT, YOLO also had an excellent accuracy (92.1%) and sensitivity (93.9%), superior to Faster R-CNN (66% accuracy, 68% sensitivity). The YOLO model exceeded 77% accuracy in pelvic and femoral-popliteal segments and 66.7% in detecting calf segment thrombi. Discussion: The CTPA-based transfer learning model significantly improved the feasibility of this method in routine CTV diagnostic performance, offering a promising approach for simultaneous PE and DVT detection.

Indexed as

CT venographydeep learningDVTpulmonary embolismtransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID42656756
PMCPMC13507883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.