ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Factors associated with psychiatric admission from observation beds in the psychiatric emergency room.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Psychiatric emergency services frequently utilize observation units to support disposition decisions when diagnostic uncertainty exists, allowing for extended psychiatric supervision to inform medical decision-making. Yet there is limited data describing predictors of inpatient admission following observation, and understanding which factors are associated with this outcome may improve clinical decision-making and resource utilization. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of adult patients placed in an observation unit within a high-volume urban psychiatric emergency service between April 1 and June 30, 2019. Demographic, psychiatric, and substance-related variables were extracted from the electronic medical record. The primary outcome was disposition to acute inpatient psychiatric admission versus no psychiatric admission. Univariate analyses were performed, followed by multivariable logistic regression to identify factors independently associated with admission. Results: Among 269 patients placed in observation, 81 (30.1%) were admitted to an acute inpatient psychiatric unit and 188 (69.9%) were not admitted to an acute psychiatric inpatient unit. In multivariable analysis, factors associated with increased odds of psychiatric admission included delusions (aOR 2.94, 95% CI 1.46-5.94), depression (aOR 2.27, 95% CI 1.17-4.43), involuntary commitment status at presentation by either a civilian (aOR 3.65, 95% CI 1.43-9.37) or physician/law enforcement (aOR 2.07, 95% CI 1.10-3.90), and absence of a breathalyzer test (aOR 3.58, 95% CI 1.56-8.19). A decreased likelihood of psychiatric admission was associated with patients with two or more prior observation discharges (aOR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08-0.84), and self-reported substance use within the prior 72 hours (aOR 0.46, 95% CI 0.25-0.84). Conclusions: In this psychiatric emergency cohort, delusions, depressive symptoms, involuntary commitment status at presentation, and absence of a completed breathalyzer were associated with increased odds of acute psychiatric admission, while self-reported substance use within the prior 72 hours and two or more prior observation discharges were associated with decreased odds. These findings should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating given the observational design, limited study window, and single-site sample. Validation in larger, multi-site, multi-season cohorts is needed before these associations can inform clinical decision-making or be incorporated into disposition prediction tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.