ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2026
The teaching swimming for understanding framework: an integrated approach to aquatic education for children and instructors.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates the impact of the Teaching Swimming for Understanding (TSfU) program within a comprehensive aquatic education framework that integrates motor, cognitive, emotional, and social learning, extending beyond sports success. A total of 200 children aged 5-8 years attending swimming lessons and 44 swimming instructors with federal licenses were recruited for the study. The instructors were divided into an experimental group that participated in a training course oriented to TSfU principles, while the control group maintained their federal formation. Children were divided into the same groups depending on their swimming instructors. Swimming lessons for both groups were recorded and analyzed to assess didactic capacity, methodological capacity, and the amount and type of physical activity among children. Moreover, questionnaires were provided to instructors to assess empathy and self-control. Children's actual and perceived water competence were assessed using two pictorial scales. All measures were administered before and after the instructor's training course and after one month of rest to assess retention. Finally, the parents of involved children were interviewed after the retention phase with semi-structured interviews to assess the transfer of swimming skills to environments outside the swimming pool (i.e., aquatic competence in open water). The TSfU group showed improvement in learners' aquatic competences, as well as perceived aquatic competencies. Meanwhile, instructors who participated in TSfU training showed notable improvements in didactic capacity values (in particular communication, organizational, and motivational skills), the number of teaching styles used, the amount of activity provided, and interaction with learners. These findings align with constructivism and the ecological-dynamics approach, supporting active, personalized, and reflective teaching. The constructivist and ecological dynamics methods encouraged retention and real-world transfer of aquatic skills, particularly in water safety, environmental awareness, and self-awareness. Instructors benefited from professional development in pedagogical and interpersonal skills, supporting the approach's sustainability. Overall, the study highlights the effectiveness of personalized, dynamic, multi-teaching strategies in fostering enduring learning outcomes and provides valuable insights for future research and practical applications in aquatic education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.