ArticlePublic health challenges2026
Challenges and Opportunities of Public Health Professionals in Nepal: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis.
Article in Public health challenges, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Public health professionals (PHPs) constitute a critical component of health systems, but their ability to apply knowledge effectively across sectors is often constrained. Persistent issues such as inadequate training, limited career opportunities, and job dissatisfaction undermine workforce effectiveness and retention globally. In Nepal, these challenges are compounded by weak alignment between academic preparation and professional realities, creating barriers for graduates and professionals to thrive within the health system. Methods: Qualitative reflexive thematic analysis (RTA) was used to understand the educational and career experiences of PHPs in Nepal. Guided by principles of information power, we recruited 18 participants via purposive and snowball sampling, and semi-structured interviews were conducted. Results: Through reflexive engagement, we constructed six key themes: (1) navigating a narrow job market, (2) struggling with practical gaps, (3) barriers to job placement, (4) foundations misaligned with practice, (5) overcoming challenges, and (6) hope and future vision. The participants reported a saturated and uncertain job market, limited mentorship, inadequate practical training, nepotistic recruitment practices, and curricula misaligned with contemporary public health practices. These factors constrain employability and career satisfaction, often prompting additional study or career shifts. Despite systemic barriers, participants expressed cautious optimism that Medical Education Commission (MEC)-led reforms, including standardized entrance examinations and integrated scholarships, together with potential vacancies at local government levels, could enhance education, improve workforce retention, and create meaningful professional roles in Nepal. Conclusions: This study highlights the urgent need to realign Nepal's public health education with professional realities. Strengthening curricula with practical, competency-based training, integrating modern technologies, providing mentorship and field exposure, and ensuring transparent employment and supportive policies can empower public health graduates and professionals. Such reforms enhance workforce resilience, career satisfaction, and professional identity, ultimately strengthening public health capacity to improve population health outcomes in resource-constrained contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.