Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42656690›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oral health2026

Minimally invasive tooth extraction: the science and clinical strategies of socket preservation: a comprehensive review.

Patr Pujarern, Wiphu Srisawan, Boontharika Chuenjitkuntaworn, Sasipa Thiradilok, Dinesh Rokaya, Suphachai Suphangul

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Patr PujarernDepartment of Advanced General Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Wiphu SrisawanDepartment of Advanced General Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Boontharika ChuenjitkuntawornDepartment of Advanced General Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sasipa ThiradilokDepartment of Advanced General Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Dinesh RokayaClinical Sciences Department, College of Dentistry, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates.
Suphachai SuphangulDepartment of Advanced General Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Tooth extraction inevitably initiates alveolar socket remodeling and resorption, particularly of the buccal bone, which may compromise future implant placement and esthetic outcomes. Methods: This narrative review synthesized current evidence on post-extraction socket healing, alveolar ridge preservation, and minimally invasive tooth extraction techniques aimed at reducing surgical trauma and maintaining hard and soft tissue integrity. Results: The literature demonstrates that significant dimensional changes occur following tooth extraction, with the greatest bone loss occurring in the buccal aspect during the early healing phase. Minimally invasive approaches, including periotomes, piezotomes, magnetic mallets, sonic instruments, physics forceps, vertical extraction systems, vestibular root extraction, enzymatically assisted extraction, socket-shield techniques, and root sectioning methods, have shown varying degrees of effectiveness in preserving alveolar bone, reducing postoperative pain and complications, and facilitating immediate implant placement. Adjunctive socket preservation strategies, such as alveolar ridge preservation and soft tissue grafting, further enhance maintenance of ridge dimensions and esthetic outcomes. Conclusion: Atraumatic extraction is a critical component of socket preservation and successful implant therapy. While several minimally invasive techniques have demonstrated promising clinical benefits in reducing tissue trauma and preserving alveolar architecture, the quality and quantity of evidence vary among techniques. Further well-designed clinical studies are required to establish standardized protocols and strengthen evidence-based clinical decision-making for minimally invasive extraction and socket preservation.

Indexed as

atraumatic extractionimmediate implant placementminimally invasive extractionsocket preservationtooth extraction

Identifiers

PMID42656690
PMCPMC13507729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.