ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
Cryobiopsy at the dawn of fibrosis: unlocking early diagnosis and therapeutic windows.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) has rapidly established itself as a promising, less invasive alternative to surgical lung biopsy for the evaluation of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). While its diagnostic accuracy and safety are increasingly recognized in clinically overt forms, its role within the more subtle spectrum of interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs) and early ILDs remains insufficiently defined and therefore largely debated. In this expert narrative review, we explore the current state of evidence surrounding TBLC and its potential applicability in these emerging clinical entities, addressing technical variability, diagnostic performance, safety profile, and integration within multidisciplinary frameworks. We further examine the ethical and clinical tension arising from the use of invasive diagnostics to largely asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic individuals, where the balance between potential benefit and harm remains undefined. Beyond these pragmatic considerations, TBLC offers a unique vantage point into the onset of fibrotic remodeling: its broader application may unveil the earliest histopathologic and biological substrates of chronic and acute tissue injury in ILDs, including aberrant basaloid cells, potential indicators of maladaptive repair that may orchestrate the fibrotic cascade. By enabling recognition of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) at its inception, TBLC holds the promise not merely of refining risk stratification, but of opening new therapeutic horizons in which antifibrotic strategies may be deployed at a stage when disease is still modifiable. We contend that rigorously designed prospective studies are urgently needed to determine whether early tissue sampling with TBLC can transform ILAs from incidental findings into a window of therapeutic opportunity, thereby altering the otherwise progressive trajectory of fibrosing lung diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.