ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2026
Latent persistence in fMRI dynamics during human memory consolidation.
Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human memory consolidation involves the gradual stabilization and reorganization of memory traces over time. Despite numerous empirical and computational accounts emphasizing different aspects of this process, an integrated framework for evaluating consolidation theories against brain data remains limited. We propose a biologically informed, data-driven framework based on Koopman operator analysis to examine latent dynamical structure in fMRI signals associated with memory consolidation. The Koopman framework lifts nonlinear brain dynamics into a linear function space, enabling spectral characterization of persistence and stability. In practice, we employ Dynamic Mode Decomposition (DMD) together with an observability-aware extension tailored to consolidation-related neural dynamics. We organize existing theories into three functional clusters: standard consolidation, episodic replay during rest, and distributed long-term storage, and then align open-access fMRI datasets with each cluster to assess their dynamical plausibility. Across datasets, delayed or repeated retrieval conditions generally tend to show greater spectral persistence than early encoding-related conditions. Among the three analyses, Cluster 3 yielded the clearest statistically reliable subject-level contrast, with semantically abstracted autobiographical content exhibiting higher mean eigenvalue magnitude and more near-unit modes than event-specific episodic content. This finding is compatible with transformation-oriented and distributed-storage accounts but does not constitute a direct temporal test of consolidation. Replay-related conditions show strong spectral differentiation across task states, although part of this separation likely reflects task structure in addition to consolidation-related dynamics. For the standard consolidation cluster, effects are directionally consistent with theory but remain small and not statistically significant at the subject level. Overall, the proposed framework provides an interpretable operator-theoretic approach for linking memory consolidation theory to latent brain dynamics and for comparing competing accounts in a common spectral language.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.