ArticleHealth affairs scholar2025
"It's confusing as hell": a qualitative study of barriers accessing poverty alleviation benefits through the US Earned Income Tax Credit.
Article in Health affairs scholar, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Safety net program participation and churning during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal analysis of low-income California families.SSM - population health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) is the largest US poverty alleviation program, with positive effects on health equity. Over 20% of eligible households do not receive benefits. Methods: In this qualitative study, we explored benefits of and barriers to EITC receipt among EITC-eligible families through analysis of 40 semi-structured interviews with EITC-eligible parents in California using the immersion-crystallization method. Results: We identified 3 categories of findings: (1) perceived benefits of EITC; (2) administrative barriers leading to low EITC take-up among eligible families, eg, learning, compliance, and psychological barriers; and (3) suggestions to improve EITC take-up. Participants reported the EITC helped families meet needs, make larger purchases, and alleviate perceived stress. Learning barriers were most salient, especially lack of information or understanding. Participants described compliance barriers (eg, tax-filing rules) and psychological barriers (eg, complexity, cognitive load, stress). Participants suggested that the EITC could be improved with more and clearer information, a streamlined system to automatically provide benefits to those eligible, and increased benefit levels. Conclusion: The EITC supports social determinants of health among recipients, yet is difficult to obtain for too many. Improving program knowledge and streamlining access for eligible households may improve take-up and health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.