Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42656612›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2025

"It's confusing as hell": a qualitative study of barriers accessing poverty alleviation benefits through the US Earned Income Tax Credit.

Wendi Gosliner, Heena Shah, Kaitlyn Jackson, Lia C H Fernald, Rita Hamad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wendi GoslinerNutrition Policy Institute, University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, CA 94607, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5092-9289
Heena ShahNutrition Policy Institute, University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, CA 94607, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7784-7946
Kaitlyn JacksonDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5154-1494
Lia C H FernaldDivision of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94704, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1555-4607
Rita HamadDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0730-4077

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) is the largest US poverty alleviation program, with positive effects on health equity. Over 20% of eligible households do not receive benefits. Methods: In this qualitative study, we explored benefits of and barriers to EITC receipt among EITC-eligible families through analysis of 40 semi-structured interviews with EITC-eligible parents in California using the immersion-crystallization method. Results: We identified 3 categories of findings: (1) perceived benefits of EITC; (2) administrative barriers leading to low EITC take-up among eligible families, eg, learning, compliance, and psychological barriers; and (3) suggestions to improve EITC take-up. Participants reported the EITC helped families meet needs, make larger purchases, and alleviate perceived stress. Learning barriers were most salient, especially lack of information or understanding. Participants described compliance barriers (eg, tax-filing rules) and psychological barriers (eg, complexity, cognitive load, stress). Participants suggested that the EITC could be improved with more and clearer information, a streamlined system to automatically provide benefits to those eligible, and increased benefit levels. Conclusion: The EITC supports social determinants of health among recipients, yet is difficult to obtain for too many. Improving program knowledge and streamlining access for eligible households may improve take-up and health equity.

Indexed as

administrative burdenEarned Income Tax Credit (EITC)health disparitiespoverty alleviationqualitative analysis

Identifiers

PMID42656612
PMCPMC13507651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.