ReviewShoulder & elbow2026
Risk factors and management of atraumatic distal clavicular osteolysis: A scoping review.
Review in Shoulder & elbow, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The aims of this review were to map the literature for risk factors, clinical and radiographic features of atraumatic distal clavicular osteolysis (ADCO) and indications for surgery. Methods: A scoping review using PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Four electronic databases [CINAHL, Emcare (Ovid), PubMed, and Scopus] were searched for cohort studies involving ADCO. Results: Eight studies were included with data on 483 patients. Bench pressing was the most common activity-based risk factor (49.1%) following by general/unspecified weight training (24.4%). Frequency and intensity of loading were noted as potential risk factors for onset of ADCO. The most common reported symptoms were distal clavicle/acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) pain (69.9%). Imaging features included marrow oedema and subchondral fracture of the distal clavicle on MRI. Most patients recovered with conservative care, but 16% required surgery due to failure of conservative care. Conclusions: Clinical signs and symptoms for ADCO were not distinguishable from other shoulder pathologies. Primary contact clinicians may benefit from consideration of sporting and loading patterns when assessing patients with ACJ pain. MRI was the most frequently utilised imaging modality but should be taken in context with clinical examination. Surgical referral resulted in largely favourable outcomes following resection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.