ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Differences in outcomes regarding quality and speed between male and female endoscopists in a virtual gastroscopy course.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: While simulator training is known to enhance endoscopic proficiency, gender differences in learning styles and outcomes remain underexplored in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. This study aimed to evaluate improvements in technical skills in a simulated environment, highlight gender differences in performance, and assess the perceived value of the course among surgical and gastroenterology trainees. Materials and methods: In this observational pre- and post-course study, surgical and gastroenterology trainees ( Results: Overall, trainees demonstrated significant improvements in technical skills following the course. No significant differences were observed between female and male participants at baseline. Post-course, female participants were significantly faster in reaching the descending part of duodenum ( Conclusions: The course significantly improved technical skills and performance quality in simulator-based endoscopy. The observed differences in improvement patterns between participants highlight the potential value of adapting training to individual learning profiles rather than broad categorisations. Such targeted approaches may help optimise endoscopic education and ultimately enhance patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.