ArticleResuscitation plus2026
RescQ™: Study protocol for a feasibility pilot of structured support for bystanders/lay-rescuers following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Worldwide, 3.8 million out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) occur annually. RescQ™ is a 12-month, non-randomised, prospective feasibility pilot evaluating a structured support pathway for adult bystanders involved in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of presumed medical or cardiac aetiology across Essex, United Kingdom. The pathway was developed to address the absence of a nationally standardised post-event support process for bystanders who witness, call emergency services, or assist with resuscitation. Attending ambulance clinicians offer brief on-scene signposting and register consenting adult bystanders through a dedicated digital application. Registration triggers a single text message or email linking to the RescQ™ website, which provides information on common physical and psychological reactions after involvement in cardiac arrest, coping strategies, lived-experience videos and sources of further support. Bystanders can self-refer to a liaison officer for structured supportive contact, psychological screening (using Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation and the National Stressful Events Survey Short Scale), event-related discussion, signposting and onward referral where required. The primary outcome is feasibility, assessed through ambulance clinician uptake, bystander website access and acceptability to ambulance clinicians and bystanders. Secondary outcomes include digital engagement, psychological screening data, liaison officer activity, onward referral, satisfaction and service-delivery resource use. The project was reviewed by the West of Scotland Regional Ethics Committee and classified as a service evaluation. At the time of revised submission, the 12-month pilot has been completed, and data analysis is underway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.