Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42656517›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Supervisory psychological support and graduate student creativity: a serial mediation model.

Xia Tao, Shang Xu, Ruihua Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xia TaoCollege of Marxism, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan, China.
Shang XuCollege of Marxism, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan, China.
Ruihua LiFaculty of Basic Education, Putian University, Putian, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extant research has examined the link between supervisory support and graduate student creativity (PGC), yet the underlying psychological and social mechanisms remain underexplored. This cross-sectional study, grounded in self-determination theory (SDT), examined a serial mediation model in which supervisory psychological support is positively associated with PGC through a sequential two-stage statistical pathway: first via its association with the quality of leader-member exchange (LMX), and subsequently via a positive team innovation climate (TIC). We surveyed 363 full-time graduate students from mainland Chinese universities and examined the hypothesized model using bootstrap resampling with 10,000 iterations. LMX and TIC jointly accounted for the majority of the association between supervisory psychological support (SPS) and PGC, with LMX also serving as a significant mediator in the relationship between SPS and TIC. Our findings suggest that in the high-power-distance, collectivist Chinese academic context, the association between supervisory support and creativity is predominantly accounted for by relational quality: LMX appears to serve as a critical relational mechanism between psychological need satisfaction and creative output. These findings extend the application of SDT to hierarchical academic mentoring contexts and highlight the culturally contingent nature of SDT's predictions. The results also provide evidence-based guidance for optimizing supervisory training and team innovation management in collectivist higher education settings. Because this study was cross-sectional, the proposed pathways should be interpreted as theory-guided statistical associations rather than evidence of causal effects or temporal ordering.

Indexed as

graduate student creativityleader-member exchange (LMX)self-determination theorysupervisory psychological supportteam innovation climate

Identifiers

PMID42656517
PMCPMC13506485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.