ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Supervisory psychological support and graduate student creativity: a serial mediation model.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extant research has examined the link between supervisory support and graduate student creativity (PGC), yet the underlying psychological and social mechanisms remain underexplored. This cross-sectional study, grounded in self-determination theory (SDT), examined a serial mediation model in which supervisory psychological support is positively associated with PGC through a sequential two-stage statistical pathway: first via its association with the quality of leader-member exchange (LMX), and subsequently via a positive team innovation climate (TIC). We surveyed 363 full-time graduate students from mainland Chinese universities and examined the hypothesized model using bootstrap resampling with 10,000 iterations. LMX and TIC jointly accounted for the majority of the association between supervisory psychological support (SPS) and PGC, with LMX also serving as a significant mediator in the relationship between SPS and TIC. Our findings suggest that in the high-power-distance, collectivist Chinese academic context, the association between supervisory support and creativity is predominantly accounted for by relational quality: LMX appears to serve as a critical relational mechanism between psychological need satisfaction and creative output. These findings extend the application of SDT to hierarchical academic mentoring contexts and highlight the culturally contingent nature of SDT's predictions. The results also provide evidence-based guidance for optimizing supervisory training and team innovation management in collectivist higher education settings. Because this study was cross-sectional, the proposed pathways should be interpreted as theory-guided statistical associations rather than evidence of causal effects or temporal ordering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.