ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Bridging medicine and education for global developmental delay: a cluster sampling study on screening, diagnosis, and intervention in preschool children.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Global developmental delay (GDD) is a common neurodevelopmental disorder in preschool children. Early screening and integrated intervention are critical for optimal neurodevelopment, yet robust evidence remains limited. Methods: A non-randomized controlled trial was conducted included 3,216 children aged 3-6 years for three-level GDD screening. Thirty children with confirmed GDD [defined as total General Quotient <70 on the Chinese version of the Griffiths Mental Development Scales (GDS-C)] were allocated to receive 6-month medical-educational integrated intervention or conventional training (exploratory pilot trial); both the overall General Quotient and domain-specific subscale developmental quotients (DQ) were evaluated via GDS-C. Results: The prevalence of GDD was 1.3%, with higher rates in boys and suburban areas. The integrated intervention group showed significantly greater DQ improvements in social, language, eye-hand coordination, visual performance, and practical reasoning domains (all Conclusion: A comprehensive multi-component intervention program, encompassing integrated medical-educational components, structured parent training, and home-based intervention measures, yielded preliminary short-term developmental benefits compared with single institutional rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.