ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Evolution from KRAS G12C-mutant to ALK fusion-positive stage IV lung adenocarcinoma following immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become standard treatment for KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma, but acquired resistance inevitably develops. Tumor clonal evolution under therapeutic pressure is a key resistance mechanism. The emergence of a new oncogenic driver mutually exclusive with the original one is rare. Case report: We report a 51-year-old female with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma harboring a KRAS G12C mutation along with TP53 and RB1 alterations. She received first-line therapy including the ICI tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy and bevacizumab, achieving a partial response (PR) that was maintained for approximately 12 months (from April 2024 to April 2025), before subsequent disease progression was documented 26 months after treatment initiation. Upon disease progression, a repeat biopsy of the lung lesion revealed persistent adenocarcinoma histology without small-cell or squamous transformation. Remarkably, next-generation sequencing demonstrated the loss of the original KRAS G12C mutation and the emergence of a novel EML4-ALK fusion. The patient was switched to the ALK inhibitor ensartinib, achieving a second PR. Conclusion: This case provides supporting evidence consistent with the selection of a pre-existing ALK fusion clone in a KRAS-mutant lung adenocarcinoma under chemo-immunotherapy pressure. It also highlights the clinical value of re-biopsy at progression to guide subsequent targeted therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.