Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42656452›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2026

Examining women's experiences with medication abortion: a critical inquiry of women's online narratives post-Dobbs.

Katherine A Rafferty, Tessa Longbons Cox, Stuart W Grande

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katherine A RaffertyCommunication Studies Program, Department of Psychology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Tessa Longbons CoxCharlotte Lozier Institute, Arlington, Virgini, United States.
Stuart W GrandeDivision of Health Policy & Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Changes in the legal landscape surrounding abortion in the United States post- Methods: Our critical inquiry examines the experiences of women who have had a medication abortion and chose to publicly share their experiences online, anonymously post- Results: We found that all posts shared a similar structure, tone, and syntax regardless of platform. Most women described their medication abortion by using explicit details about their decisions and the process of the medication abortion. We identified three primary discourse types that characterize women's online narratives: (1) abandonment, (2) delusion of choice, and (3) "good mothering." Discussion: Our findings demonstrate how choices to share medication abortion stories represented private acts of defiance during a public controversy in a public online space. Women's intimate narratives showcase the complexity surrounding medication abortion, signaling women's individual challenges coupled with their feelings of societal abandonment against the larger backdrop of double-edged political and cultural discourses about motherhood and medication abortion.

Indexed as

discoursesgrounded theory approachmedication abortiononline narrativespost-Dobbswomen's experiences

Identifiers

PMID42656452
PMCPMC13506762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.