ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation versus adjuvant radiation in surgically managed HPV-mediated OPSCC: a ten-year study using 8th edition AJCC pathologic staging.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: HPV-mediated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV+ OPSCC) is a disease associated with improved overall survival (OS). We explore the role and benefit of adjuvant chemoradiation in this population. Methods: 9, 925 patients in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) who underwent definitive surgical treatment for HPV+ OPSCC followed by adjuvant treatment were included in the study. The primary outcome was OS. Results: 4, 828 patients received adjuvant radiation (RT) and 5, 097 patients received adjuvant chemoradiation (CRT). There was no significant difference in OS between both groups. Increasing positive lymph node number increased the likelihood of patients receiving adjuvant CRT. In the proportional hazards model, patients with higher numbers of positive nodes had significantly reduced OS. The 5-6 positive node group was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.42 (CI: [1.15-1.75], p = 0.009) while > 6 positive nodes was associated with a HR of 2.19 (CI: [1.86-2.59], p < 0.001), when compared to 0-4 positive nodes. Multivariable analysis demonstrated no significant difference in OS between patients with ≤ 6 positive nodes with adjuvant CRT versus RT. The > 6 positive node group had significantly better OS with CRT versus RT. Conclusion: There was no observed difference in OS in surgically treated HPV+ OPSCC patients receiving adjuvant CRT versus adjuvant RT alone. Patients with higher positive node numbers were more likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy, but no statistically significant survival benefit over RT was observed in patients with 0-6 involved nodes. Ongoing prospective trials should critically evaluate the role of adjuvant CRT in the postoperative management of HPV+ OPSCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.