Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42656434›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in physiology2026

Optimal exercise dose for resistance training to improve HbA1c levels in overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Huarui Li, Shidong Yang, Xuefeng Wang, Zhiwei Wang, Wei Zhang, Xuehai Zhang, Shouliang Huang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Huarui LiSchool of Physical Education, Nanjing XiaoZhuang Unversity, Nanjing, China.
Shidong YangSchool of Physical Education, Nanjing XiaoZhuang Unversity, Nanjing, China.
Xuefeng WangSchool of Physical Education, Nanjing XiaoZhuang Unversity, Nanjing, China.
Zhiwei WangSchool of Physical Education, Nanjing XiaoZhuang Unversity, Nanjing, China.
Wei ZhangSchool of Physical Education, Nanjing XiaoZhuang Unversity, Nanjing, China.
Xuehai ZhangSchool of Physical Education, Nanjing XiaoZhuang Unversity, Nanjing, China.
Shouliang HuangCollege of Physisal Education and Health, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The high prevalence of overweight or obesity in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is strongly associated with impaired quality of life and an increased risk of long-term complications. Poor glycemic control remains a fundamental clinical challenge in this population. Although resistance training (RT) is an effective intervention for improving HbA1c levels, the optimal dosing parameters​ (e.g., frequency, intensity, volume) have not been systematically established. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to investigate the dose-response relationships​ between various RT regimens and HbA1c reduction in overweight or obese individuals with T2DM. Methods: This systematic review and network meta-analysis, conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, included randomized controlled trials on resistance training in patients with T2DM who were overweight or obese, conducted from the inception of the databases through January 19, 2026. Comprehensive data extraction covered training dose, resistance training protocols, participants' demographic characteristics, and study duration. Results: A total of 10 studies involving 633 participants (mean age: 60.03 ± 7.77 years; mean BMI: 30.69 ± 6.64; Male: 32.7%) were included in this study. The results of our network meta-analysis showed that resistance training variables (e.g., frequency, intensity, period, and training volume) were effective in improving HbA1c in overweight or obese patients with T2DM. Among them, the effective dose range for frequency of resistance training was 3 times/week, resistance training intensity was 30-62%, resistance training period was 17-23 weeks, resistance training time was 45 minutes per session, resistance training exercises was 10 exercises per set, resistance training repetitions was 13-18 reps, resistance training sets was 2-4 sets, resistance training volume was 1000-2100 reps per week. the analysis suggested a potential optimum around of resistance training to improve HbA1c in overweight or obese patients with T2DM is 3 times/week (MD=-0.35, 95% CrI [-0.62, -0.08]), 44% 1RM (MD=-0.41, 95% CrI [-0.74, -0.08]), 23 weeks (MD = -0.35, 95% CrI [-0.68, -0.02]), 45min (MD = -0.32, 95% CrI [-0.62, -0.01]), 10 exercises (MD = -0.32, 95% CrI [-0.63, -0.01]), 18 reps (MD=-0.38; 95% CrI [-0.74, -0.02]), 3 sets (MD=-0.36, 95% CrI [-0.63, -0.10]), 1,500 reps/week (MD = -0.51, 95% CrI [-0.86, -0.15]). Conclusion: Resistance training effectively improvesHbA1c in overweight or obese patients with T2DM. A recommended 23-week program includes 3 sessions per week at 44% 1RM, 45min per session, featuring 10 exercises per set, 3 sets, and 18 repetitions per exercise, totaling up to 1500 reps weekly. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420261341070.

Indexed as

HbA1cobesityoptimal doseover-weightresistance trainingtype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID42656434
PMCPMC13506765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.