Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42656433›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Spectral CT-derived quantitative imaging parameters combined with inflammatory markers for exploratory preoperative grading of bladder cancer.

Shuang Qin, Yi Hong, Jie Cheng, Qi Lv

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shuang QinDepartment of Medical Imaging, Shanghai Xuhui Central Hospital/Xuhui Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yi HongDepartment of Medical Imaging, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Jie ChengDepartment of Urology, Shanghai Xuhui Central Hospital/Xuhui Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Qi LvDepartment of Medical Imaging, Shanghai Xuhui Central Hospital/Xuhui Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pathological grade and muscular invasion determine bladder cancer treatment and prognosis. Conventional CT lacks quantitative tumor characterization, while gemstone spectral imaging CT (GSI-CT) provides perfusion-related quantitative metrics; systemic inflammatory markers also correlate with tumor aggressiveness. Objective: To explore whether combined GSI-CT parameters and inflammatory markers improve preoperative bladder cancer grading, and analyze their association with muscular invasion. Methods: This single-center retrospective study enrolled 61 pathologically confirmed bladder cancer patients (26 low-grade, 35 high-grade) with preoperative GSI-CT. Venous-phase iodine concentration (IC), spectral slope λHU, effective atomic number (Zeff) and four inflammatory indices were measured. Between-group comparisons, logistic regression and DeLong ROC comparison were performed using SPSS 25.0 and R 4.3.3 (α = 0.05). Results: Venous-phase IC, λHU and Zeff were significantly elevated in high-grade lesions, while lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) was markedly lower (all Conclusions: Combined GSI-CT and LMR jointly reflect tumor angiogenesis and host immunity, yet the dual-parameter model offered no statistically meaningful incremental grading value over LMR in this NMIBC-dominated single-center cohort. The auxiliary value of λHU needs large multi-center prospective verification.

Indexed as

bladder cancergemstone spectral imaging CTinflammatory markersiodine concentrationspectral curve slope

Identifiers

PMID42656433
PMCPMC13506437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.