Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42656412›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026

Comparative genomics of carbapenem resistant and susceptible clinical

Sara Pearl, Anand Anbarasu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sara PearlDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Bio Sciences and Technology (SBST), Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, India.
Anand AnbarasuDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Bio Sciences and Technology (SBST), Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Vellore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Carbapenem resistant Methods: In this study, a comprehensive comparative genomics was performed using publicly available 395 clinical Results: CRAB genome subset demonstrated higher abundance of ARGs (acquired carbapenemases in particular), plasmids, carbapenem resistance-associated insertion sequences, and integrons than CSAB genomes. PanGWAS identified six positively associated genes ( Conclusion: This study provides an overall genomic architecture of CRAB integrating comparative genomics, PanGWAS, and phylogenomics approaches. The findings underscore the complex interplay between ARGs, VFs, and MGEs in the genomic evolution of CRAB, expanding current understanding of CRAB adaptation and may contribute toward enhanced surveillance, antimicrobial stewardship, and exploration of alternative therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

Acinetobacter baumanniiAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsGenomicsAcinetobacter InfectionsComputer SimulationGene Transfer, HorizontalGenome, BacterialGenotypeHumansInterspersed Repetitive SequencesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPhylogenyPlasmidsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasescarbapenemaseCarbapenemsVirulence FactorsA. baumanniiantimicrobial resistancecarbapenemasehorizontal gene transferPanGWASphylogenomics

Identifiers

PMID42656412
PMCPMC13506764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.