ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
Multimodal assessment of the effects of radial pressure wave therapy on spastic muscles in patients with traumatic brain injury.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Radial pressure wave therapy (rPWT) has shown promise in reducing spastic symptoms; however, its application in patients with spasticity following traumatic brain injury, particularly in those with prolonged disorders of consciousness (pDoC), remains underreported. The study aimed to investigate the immediate effects of rPWT on spastic muscles in patients with TBI-associated pDoC. Methods: Ten patients with pDoC and upper limb spasticity and ten healthy controls received a single session of rPWT (2.5 Bar, 2000 shots) to the biceps brachii. Assessments were conducted at four time points: pre-intervention (Pre), immediately after intervention (Post), 2 days, and 7 days after intervention. Evaluation included the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Modified Tardieu Scale (MTS), muscle hardness (via handheld hardness meter), and muscle elasticity (via ultrasound elastography). Changes over time and between-group differences were evaluated. For preliminary subgroup analysis, patients were divided into Good Responders and Poor Responders based on the change from Pre- to Post-intervention to determine factors affecting responsiveness. Results: MAS remained unchanged, while MTS (R1) scores improved immediately after rPWT in 9 of 10 patients. However, no sustained improvement was observed on Day 7. Patients in Good Responders tended to have higher baseline muscle hardness, higher muscle elasticity, and lower MTS (R1) values. Conclusion: rPWT resulted in an immediate, though transient changes in spastic muscle symptoms of patients with pDoC. Our preliminary analyses demonstrated the possibility that greater baseline muscle stiffness might influence responsiveness. These findings would be considered when designing protocols to evaluate the efficacy of rPWT for spasticity in patients with TBI-related pDoC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.