ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026
An interpretable multimodal model for early prediction of delayed hematoma progression in frontal lobe contusion: a machine learning approach.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early identification of delayed hematoma progression (DHP) in patients with frontal lobe contusion remains challenging in emergency settings. This study aimed to develop and externally validate an interpretable multimodal machine-learning model integrating routinely available clinical, laboratory, and CT imaging features to predict DHP. Methods: This retrospective multicenter study included a development cohort of 799 patients and an external validation cohort of 443 patients. The development cohort was divided into a training set and an internal test set using stratified sampling. Feature selection was performed exclusively within the training set using seven complementary methods. Ten machine-learning algorithms were trained and compared using five-fold cross-validation. Model performance was assessed using AUROC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1-score, calibration analysis, and decision-curve analysis. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to interpret the final model. Results: Ten predictors were selected, including baseline contusion volume, hematoma density-related features, hematoma surface area-to-volume ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, admission Glasgow Coma Scale score, glucose-to-potassium ratio, time to baseline CT, and eosinophil count. The support vector machine (SVM) model showed the highest AUROC point estimate in the internal test set, with an AUROC of 0.801, and achieved an external validation AUROC of 0.724, indicating moderate external discrimination. Conclusion: We developed an interpretable multimodal model for early prediction of DHP in patients with frontal lobe contusion. The model may assist early risk stratification and clinical monitoring, but further prospective, multicenter, and geographically diverse validation is required before broad clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.