ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Racism and mental health within humanitarian and development organisations: perspectives from in-house mental health professionals.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Racism is recognised as a concern within humanitarian and development (HD) organisations, yet little research has examined its implications for staff mental health. Notably, the perspectives of in-house mental health professionals (MHPs)-a key but understudied group-have remained absent from the literature. This study addresses this gap by asking three questions: First, how do MHPs perceive and personally experience racism within HD organisations? Second, in what ways does racism affect the mental health of staff, and how do MHPs navigate their role in addressing these impacts? Third, how do MHPs evaluate existing organisational responses to racism, and what changes do they consider necessary to strengthen anti-racism efforts and link these to staff well-being? Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with ten currently employed or recently retired MHPs across United Nations entities and an organisation belonging to the Red Cross/Red Crescent Movement. Participants were recruited via organisational circulation and snowball sampling. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Results: Three themes identified. (1) Discussion: Racism in HD organisations emerges as widespread yet insufficiently addressed, with its mental health impacts largely managed in private. Findings indicate the need for integrated approaches that link anti-racism and staff-wellbeing strategies, recognise racism as an occupational health issue, and include MHPs in organisational transformation efforts. This study provides evidence from a hard-to-reach and rarely examined group, and highlights critical directions for institutional change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.