ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Predictors of neurological recovery in spinal epidural abscess: the impact of radiographic compression, ASIA scores, and surgical delay.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Controversy remains whether spinal epidural abscess (SEA) should be managed conservatively or by early surgical decompression. It is essential to understand how clinical and radiological parameters correlate with neurological deficits and how they predict recovery trajectories. Objective: Our aim was to evaluate whether the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features, the clinical management factors, and the neurological status on admission can predict neurological recovery in patients with SEA. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed with SEA between 2021 and 2024 with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. Collected variables included demographics, duration of preoperative antibiotic therapy, the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor scores, and the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores. Quantitative MRI parameters were assessed, including cord T2 hyperintensity, ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF), and maximum spinal cord compression (MSCC). Neurological recovery was calculated using the ASIA recovery rate, which was dichotomized as good (≥50%) or poor (<50%). Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed. Results: A total of 125 patients were included, of whom 24 were treated conservatively and 101 underwent surgical decompression. Cord T2 hyperintensity ( Conclusion: Both the clinical and radiological parameters upon presentation are predictors of neurological recovery rates in SEA. Delayed surgical decompression beyond 3 weeks is associated with poorer neurological recovery. Clinical trial registration: [website], identifier GWLCZXEC-SOP-K-2025-137.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.