ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Selenium nanoparticles for breast cancer: mechanisms, delivery strategies, and translational challenges.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer treatment remains limited by drug resistance, toxicity, and inadequate selectivity in aggressive subtypes, prompting continued interest in selenium-based agents whose anticancer activity depends strongly on chemical form, redox behavior, and metabolic fate. This review critically compares inorganic, organic, and nanoscale selenium, with particular emphasis on selenium nanoparticles (SeNPs) as engineerable platforms for breast cancer therapy. Current evidence indicates that selenium-based agents primarily exert antitumor effects through disruption of redox homeostasis, induction of apoptosis, and modulation of survival signaling pathways such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR, while additional effects on autophagy, metastasis, angiogenesis, and treatment resistance appear to be more context-dependent. Compared with conventional selenium compounds, SeNPs offer greater formulation flexibility through surface modification, cargo loading, and stimulus-responsive design, and have shown promising activity especially in triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer models. However, clinical translation is restricted by the lack of breast cancer-specific early-phase therapeutic studies and by persistent uncertainties regarding the therapeutic window, pharmacokinetics, long-term safety, manufacturing reproducibility, and patient selection. By integrating selenium speciation, SeNP preparation strategies, subtype-oriented applications, and translational barriers, this review highlights that future progress will depend on standardized formulations, rigorous
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.