ArticleFrontiers in dental medicine2026
Evaluation of the apical sealing ability of bioRoot RCS with Various Gutta-percha cones using spectrophotometry and scanning electron microscopy: an
Article in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The success of root canal therapy is highly dependent on achieving a well-sealed canal system to prevent apical microleakage and reinfection. The apical seal is primarily influenced by the sealing properties of the root canal sealer and the compatibility of the gutta-percha cones used for obturation. Objective: To evaluate the apical sealing ability of BioRoot RCS with various hydrophilic-coated gutta-percha cones using spectrophotometric analysis and to assess the obturation material-sealer-dentin interface using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Materials and methods: Ninety-six extracted human premolars were randomly divided into four groups ( Results: The BioRoot RCS/bioceramic-coated gutta-percha group exhibited the lowest mean dye absorbance (0.0013 ± 0.0005), whereas the BioRoot RCS/gutta-percha group showed the highest (0.0057 ± 0.0010). SEM analysis demonstrated the smallest mean interfacial gap in the BioRoot RCS/bioceramic-coated gutta-percha group (2.76 ± 0.15 µm) and the largest in the BioRoot RCS/gutta-percha group (5.43 ± 0.16 µm). The differences among the groups were statistically significant ( Conclusion: Bioceramic-coated gutta-percha with BioRoot RCS provided superior sealing ability, confirmed by both spectrophotometric and SEM evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.