ReviewFrontiers in psychology2026
Toward a Culturally Situated SDT-EI Model of emotional intelligence in physical education: a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emotional intelligence (EI) has emerged as a pivotal construct in educational psychology; however, understanding of how physical education (PE) contributes to its development remains fragmented. Eight prior systematic reviews have concluded that PE can develop EI, but three gaps persist: no integration across educational stages, no unified mechanistic account, and no cross-cultural perspective-despite emerging evidence that EI pathways differ across cultural contexts. This narrative review synthesizes 64 publications-including primary studies, eight systematic reviews, and meta-analyses published from 2014 to 2026, together with foundational theoretical works outside that window-through thematic synthesis complemented by an exploratory bibliometric scan, effect direction plotting, and transparent evidence grading, organized around self-determination theory (SDT) as a unifying mechanistic framework with culture positioned as a formal boundary condition. The review centers on PE as a curricular subject in formal educational settings; organized sport enters it only where embedded in educational programs. Four pedagogical models are identified-Teaching Games for Understanding combined with Sport Education, the Sport Education Model, cooperative learning and Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility, and mindfulness/body-expression approaches-and their shared effectiveness is best accounted for by their convergent capacity to satisfy basic psychological needs. The Mercader-Rubio research program and independent cross-validations are synthesized into an SDT-based mechanistic account whose supporting evidence is predominantly cross-sectional and self-report-based and therefore associational rather than causal. Drawing on three direct cross-cultural comparisons, evidence is presented that multiple key links in this chain are culturally modulated. These findings are integrated into a proposed Culturally Situated SDT-EI Model of Physical Education-a theoretically derived framework that has not yet been tested as an integrated structure-generating three design principles for culturally responsive PE-EI programs and eight priorities for the empirical validation the model now requires.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.