ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Assessment of prognostic stratification in colorectal cancer liver metastases using preoperative CT habitat imaging.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to explore the value of radiomic features derived from preoperative CT habitat imaging in prognostic stratification of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM), and to construct the predictive model incorporating clinical information for individualized risk assessment. Methods: Retrospectively data from 196 patients with CRLM who underwent surgical resection were collected, including preoperative portal venous phase CT images and clinical information. First, tumor regions were segmented into habitat subregions using the K-means clustering algorithm to capture intra-tumoral heterogeneity. Subsequently, habitat radiomic features were extracted and dimensionality was reduced through Spearman correlation analysis followed by Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, key features were then selected using the maximum relevance minimum redundancy method. Habitat models and combined clinical-habitat models were constructed based on Naive Bayes, multilayer perceptron (MLP), and XGBoost algorithms, respectively. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC), decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration curves. Results: Compared with Naive Bayes and MLP, XGBoost demonstrated superior predictive performance in evaluating the prognosis of patients with CRLM. In both the training and validation cohorts, the combined clinical-habitat model achieved the best performance, with the AUC of 0.935 and 0.893, the sensitivity of 95.00% and 84.00%, and the specificity of 94.87% and 84.85%, respectively. Decision curve analysis showed that the predictive model provided a high net clinical benefit, and calibration curves confirmed good agreement between the predicted probabilities and the actual observed outcomes. The proposed model presents significant advantages in predictive accuracy compared with previous studies based only on traditional radiomics or clinical indicators. Conclusion: Habitat imaging based on preoperative CT can effectively quantify intratumoral heterogeneity. The combined model constructed with machine learning algorithms exhibits excellent performance in prognostic stratification of patients with CRLM. This approach provides a non-invasive, high-precision novel tool for clinical prognostic evaluation, with important promotion value and promising application prospects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.