ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
From comparative oncology to AI-enabled precision medicine: translational biomodels for triple-negative breast cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), defined by the absence of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression or amplification, comprises a biologically heterogeneous group of tumors with aggressive clinical behavior and limited biomarker-guided treatment options. Although chemotherapy, immune-checkpoint inhibition, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates have expanded the therapeutic landscape, durable benefit remains constrained by genomic instability, homologous recombination deficiency, phenotypic plasticity, immune-stromal interactions, and treatment-driven evolution. This Perspective critically examines how complementary translational biomodels can be organized into a fit-for-purpose framework for TNBC precision oncology. Spontaneous canine mammary tumors provide naturally evolving disease in immunocompetent hosts, whereas patient- and species-derived organoids enable scalable functional perturbation and drug-response profiling. Patient-derived xenografts preserve clinically relevant tumor heterogeneity and treatment-selected states, while genetically engineered mouse models support mechanistic interrogation of defined oncogenic events
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.