SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Integrated meta-analysis and exploratory small-sample machine learning to evaluate curcumin against osteoporosis: a preclinical evidence-based study.
Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To systematically evaluate the anti-osteoporotic efficacy of curcumin in preclinical models and utilize an exploratory small-sample machine learning (ML) framework to examine potential contributors to heterogeneity and generate preliminary dose-duration hypotheses. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched eight databases for controlled Results: Twenty-three studies were included. Meta-analysis revealed that curcumin significantly elevated femoral BMD [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 2.73, P < 0.001], preserved trabecular microarchitecture, and enhanced biomechanical strength. Curcumin was also associated with changes in bone-remodeling and oxidative stress-related markers. Based on only 23 study-level observations, exploratory ML suggested that body weight had the largest model-dependent contribution (mean |SHAP| = 0.201). GPR modeling suggested a bell-shaped dose-response relationship, with the fitted response reaching a local maximum at an HED of approximately 32 mg/(kg·d) and an intervention duration of 8-12 weeks. These model-derived findings should not be interpreted as validated optimal dose or duration estimates. Conclusion: Curcumin exerts potent, multi-target osteoprotective effects that are associated with improved bone remodeling and oxidative stress-related indices. The exploratory integration of ML with meta-analysis suggested that biological characteristics and dosage may contribute to variability in treatment effects. However, because the ML component was constrained by the limited number of study-level observations, these model-derived findings should be regarded as hypothesis-generating signals and should not be interpreted as independently validated predictors or clinical dosing recommendations. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD420251269951.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.