Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42656248›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026

Dressing patterns in healthy individuals and brain-damaged patients: the MIlan Dressing Assessment.

Elisabetta Banco, Giacomo Guidali, Angela Rossetti, Irene Rossi, Carlotta Casati, Cecilia Chessa, Giuseppe Vallar, Nadia Bolognini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elisabetta BancoLaboratory of Neuropsychology, Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
Giacomo GuidaliDepartment of Psychology & NeuroMI-Milan Center for Neuroscience, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Angela RossettiLaboratory of Neuropsychology, Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
Irene RossiLaboratory of Neuropsychology, Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
Carlotta CasatiLaboratory of Neuropsychology, Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
Cecilia ChessaO.U. Neuromotor Rehabilitation, Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe VallarDepartment of Psychology & NeuroMI-Milan Center for Neuroscience, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Nadia BologniniLaboratory of Neuropsychology, Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The ability to dress appropriately is a fundamental daily living skill that is often impaired by neurological disorders and can manifest as a specific form of apraxia (dressing apraxia). Despite its prevalence and impact on functional independence, standardized and reliable assessment tools for dressing skills remain limited. The aim of this study was to identify dressing patterns in healthy individuals and use them as a reference for introducing a new clinical tool to assess dressing skills. Methods: We conducted two studies, including seventy healthy participants (mean age = 48.73 ± 17.85 years; range = 20-87) and 22 brain-damaged patients (21 with stroke, 1 with a neoplastic lesion; mean age = 69.7 ± 13.1 years; range = 45-87). Dressing patterns for different garment types were identified among healthy participants and then used as a reference to assess dressing skills in brain-damaged patients using a 3-point rating scale across multiple garments, namely the MIlan Dressing Assessment (MIDA). Interrater reliability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Associations between dressing skills scores and demographic or clinical variables were assessed using Spearman correlations, while differences by lesion side and location, and neuropsychological deficits were examined using Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: Reliable dressing patterns were identified for eight garments in healthy participants; they were largely independent of demographic factors, though specific age-related variations emerged for five garments, and a sex-related difference was found for scarf wearing. Forty-five percent of brain-damaged patients presented with impaired ability to dress. In this clinical group, the MIDA demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.93). Higher dressing skills scores were associated with lower neurological severity, greater functional independence, and better non-verbal reasoning skills. Dressing patterns differed in the presence of unilateral spatial neglect and constructional apraxia. Conclusion: The MIDA offers a novel structured framework to evaluate dressing skills and assess patients' residual autonomy during this complex everyday activity. This exploratory study provides a foundation for future studies aimed at defining its broader feasibility and role in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingApraxiasBrain InjuriesStrokeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adultapraxiaassessmentbrain-damaged patientscognitivedressing patternsstroke

Identifiers

PMID42656248
PMCPMC13506407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.