Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42656240›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2026

Adjuvant neuroprotective therapies for acute ischemic stroke in the reperfusion era: a comparative narrative review of clinical evidence for edaravone, edaravone-dexborneol, and butylphthalide.

Weiqing Wang, Junsen Ye

Abstract readReviewComparative Study
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Weiqing WangDepartment of Neurology, First People's Hospital of Jiande City, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Junsen YeDepartment of Scientific Research, First People's Hospital of Jiande City, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reperfusion therapies, including intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular treatment (EVT), are central to acute ischemic stroke (AIS) management; however, ischemia-reperfusion injury may limit recovery despite successful recanalization. This structured narrative review compares the clinical evidence, safety signals, and mechanistic literature for edaravone, butylphthalide (NBP), and the fixed-dose combination edaravone-dexborneol (EDB) as adjunctive neuroprotective approaches. The evidence base is heterogeneous with respect to population, background reperfusion treatment, outcome timing, and geographical setting. In TASTE-2, EDB administered before EVT was associated with a modest increase in 90-day functional independence versus placebo (55.0% vs. 49.6%,

Indexed as

BenzofuransEdaravoneIschemic StrokeNeuroprotective AgentsReperfusionReperfusion InjuryHumans3-n-butylphthalideBenzofuransEdaravoneNeuroprotective Agentsacute ischemic strokeadjunctive therapybutylphthalideedaravone-dexborneolendovascular thrombectomyneuroprotectionreperfusion injury

Identifiers

PMID42656240
PMCPMC13506449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.