Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42656194›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026

Impact of light pollution spectra and intensity on the development and mortality of tiger mosquito (Aedes albopictus) larvae.

Lauren E Johnson, Emma R Uder, Kathleen G Dobbs, Elena Powell, Laura L Tayon, Tom Radomski, Kim A Medley, Katie M Westby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lauren E JohnsonTyson Research Center, Washington University in St Louis, Eureka, MO 63025, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4031-056X
Emma R UderTyson Research Center, Washington University in St Louis, Eureka, MO 63025, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-8322-6534
Kathleen G DobbsTyson Research Center, Washington University in St Louis, Eureka, MO 63025, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-3415-4814
Elena PowellTyson Research Center, Washington University in St Louis, Eureka, MO 63025, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-8184-1594
Laura L TayonTyson Research Center, Washington University in St Louis, Eureka, MO 63025, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-2963-7440
Tom RadomskiTyson Research Center, Washington University in St Louis, Eureka, MO 63025, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9734-8924
Kim A MedleyTyson Research Center, Washington University in St Louis, Eureka, MO 63025, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7858-4398
Katie M WestbyTyson Research Center, Washington University in St Louis, Eureka, MO 63025, USA.

Funding

Living Earth CollaborativeNational Science Foundation DGE-2139839National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program DGE-2139839Tyson Research CenterWashington University in St LouisWashington University in St. Louis Read and Publish Agreement
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Light pollution is a global urban stressor that can impact the behavior, physiology and fitness of many species, including disease vectors such as the tiger mosquito (Aedes albopictus). Experimental and observational studies in diverse arthropods have shown that artificial light at night (ALAN) can either slow development or accelerate it at the cost of higher mortality, suggesting that immature life stages may be vulnerable to light pollution. This study investigated how varying intensities of artificial light pollution - using both high-pressure sodium (HPS) and light-emitting diode (LED) lamps - affect the developmental rates of immature Ae. albopictus mosquitoes under semi-natural field conditions. During a controlled field experiment, newly hatched Ae. albopictus larvae were exposed to five different light intensity levels (10, 30, 60, 100 and 200 lx) under HPS and LED illumination alongside a control group without artificial light exposure. We measured time to pupation and emergence and mortality in both male and female mosquitoes to assess the biological impacts of varying light type and intensity. Our findings indicated no significant differences in average time to pupation or emergence across the different combinations of light type and intensity or control groups. However, greater variation was observed within certain light type and intensity combinations, suggesting potential nuances in ecological impacts not reflected in group averages. Mortality was consistently low across all groups, indicating that light pollution does not significantly impair larval survival in Ae. albopictus. These results suggest that under typical urban lighting conditions, Ae. albopictus development and immature survival remain robust.

Indexed as

AedesLightLight PollutionAnimalsFemaleLarvaMaleALANArtificial light at nightCulicidaeEmergenceHigh-pressure sodium lampInsectLEDMortalityPupationUrban ecologyUrbanization

Identifiers

PMID42656194
PMCPMC13615692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.