Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42656110›Full record

ArticleSheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi2026

[Coupling characteristics of cellular electroporation and electrodeformation based on dynamic Young's modulus: influence of membrane thickness].

Xiangbiao Wei, Shengnan Zou, Fanyu Guo, Linying Liu

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiangbiao WeiCollege of Advanced Manufacturing, Fuzhou University, Quanzhou, Fujian 362251, P. R. China.
Shengnan ZouQuanzhou Equipment Manufacturing Research Center, Haixi Institutes, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Quanzhou, Fujian 362200, P. R. China.
Fanyu GuoQuanzhou Equipment Manufacturing Research Center, Haixi Institutes, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Quanzhou, Fujian 362200, P. R. China.
Linying LiuCollege of Physics and Information Engineering, Quanzhou Normal University, Quanzhou, Fujian 362000, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the effect of membrane thickness on the coupled electroporation-electrodeformation response of the cell membrane, a coupled model incorporating a dynamic Young's modulus was developed to simulate transmembrane voltage, spatiotemporal pore evolution, and cell deformation at different membrane thicknesses. As membrane thickness increased from 6 to 10 nm, both the transmembrane voltage and pore radius peaked earlier. At 50 ns, pore density at the cell poles increased by 19.78%-67.44%, total electroporated area by 257.48%-859.36%, and the reduction in Young's modulus became more pronounced. Despite increased membrane softening, peak Maxwell stress decreased by 26.15%-63.28% and remained the dominant factor, reducing peak displacement at the cell poles by 12.35%-34.75%. These findings show that membrane thickness modulates the coupled response by jointly affecting electrically induced pore formation, membrane mechanical properties, and Maxwell stress. The model provides a theoretical basis for designing pulse parameters for cells with different membrane structural characteristics.

Indexed as

Cell MembraneElastic ModulusElectroporationElectrodesModels, BiologicalDynamic Young’s modulusElectrodeformationElectroporated areaElectroporationPore radius evolution

Identifiers

PMID42656110
PMCPMC13519813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.