Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42656108›Full record

ArticleSheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi2026

[Development and validation of an explainable machine learning-based model for predicting mortality risk in polytrauma patients].

Yupeng Jiang, Jinlong Mao, Lin Li, Chunyang Liang, Hongjun Kang, Zhilong Jia, Xiaoli Liu, Zhengbo Zhang

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yupeng JiangMedical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, P. R. China.
Jinlong MaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, P. R. China.
Lin LiMedical Artificial Intelligence Research Center, Medical Innovation Research Department, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, P. R. China.
Chunyang LiangDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, P. R. China.
Hongjun KangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, P. R. China.
Zhilong JiaMedical Artificial Intelligence Research Center, Medical Innovation Research Department, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, P. R. China.
Xiaoli LiuMedical Artificial Intelligence Research Center, Medical Innovation Research Department, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, P. R. China.
Zhengbo ZhangMedical Artificial Intelligence Research Center, Medical Innovation Research Department, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polytrauma is commonly defined as multisystem trauma involving at least two body regions with an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score ≥ 3, characterized by complex pathophysiological interactions and extreme clinical heterogeneity. This study retrospectively analyzed data from 171 274 polytrauma patients in the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) from 2018 to 2021. Key features were selected using the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm. Prediction models were then developed using XGBoost, logistic regression, random forest, naive Bayes, and support vector machine, respectively. Model performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Subgroup standardized mortality ratio (SMR) validation and global and local interpretability analysis based on SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) theory were also conducted. The results demonstrated that the XGBoost model incorporating Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), massive transfusion within 4 hours, respiratory support, unplanned intubation, prehospital care-limiting directives, unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission, sepsis, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and liver cirrhosis achieved optimal performance, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.90. Its calibration curve closely aligned with the ideal diagonal, and decision curve analysis indicated the highest clinical net benefit across a wide range of threshold probabilities. Subgroup SMRs ranged from 1.07 to 1.18, all close to 1.0. In conclusion, the developed in-hospital mortality risk prediction model for polytrauma patients exhibits favorable discrimination and clinical net benefit, and can assist clinicians in identifying high-risk populations while providing evidence to support individualized treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMultiple TraumaBayes TheoremBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsFemaleGlasgow Coma ScaleHumansInjury Severity ScoreLogistic ModelsMalePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPrognosisRandom ForestRetrospective StudiesMachine learningPolytraumaPrediction modelSHAP interpretability

Identifiers

PMID42656108
PMCPMC13519818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.