ArticleSheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi2026
[Inductance calculation method for transcranial magnetic stimulation figure-8 coils Accounting for spatial mutual inductance].
Article in Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is widely used in the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders, and the stimulation coil constitutes a critical component of TMS devices. Existing inductance calculations for figure-8 coils suffer from three notable shortcomings: they are mostly limited to single-layer geometries, they still rely on elliptic integrals, and they systematically overlook spatial mutual coupling among windings. To address these issues, we propose a high-precision analytical method that accommodates both flat spiral and multi-layer stacked coil configurations. Instead of adopting a conventional lumped-equivalent model, the proposed approach decoupled the total inductance into four independent contributions: self-inductance, coaxial layer-to-layer mutual inductance, coplanar mutual inductance, and non-coplanar mutual inductance. The self-inductance term was computed through a modified magnetic circuit procedure. The coaxial mutual inductance was obtained from parametric curves that incorporated the wire cross-section, built upon the geometric mean distance theory. The coplanar and non-coplanar mutual inductances were derived by combining the Maxwell-Wien series expansion with geometric perturbation theory. The overall coil inductance was then determined by analyzing the circuit connection. Finite element simulations and experimental measurements verified the accuracy and robustness of the method at both the individual-component level and the system level, laying a theoretical foundation for the optimal design of high-performance TMS coils.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.