SynthesisJournal of surgical oncology2026
Extended Versus Non-Extended Lymphadenectomy in Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pelvic lymph node dissection is an essential component of radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer (BC), but the optimal extent of lymphadenectomy remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare oncologic and perioperative outcomes between extended and non-extended lymphadenectomy during RC for BC. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and ClinicalTrials. gov were searched up to October 2025 following PRISMA guidelines and PROSPERO registration. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing extended versus non-extended lymphadenectomy in adults undergoing RC were included. Outcomes included surgery duration, intraoperative blood loss, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Random-effects meta-analyses were performed, reporting hazard ratios (HRs) or mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I, and certainty of evidence using GRADE. Fifteen studies including 5671 patients were analyzed, of which two were RCTs. Extended lymphadenectomy was associated with longer operative time (MD + 26.2 min) and improved DFS (HR: 1.47), but no significant benefit in OS or CSS. Non-extended lymphadenectomy was associated with higher RFS (HR: 0.79). Heterogeneity was moderate to high, and certainty of evidence was very low for most outcomes and low for OS considering only RCTs. Extended lymphadenectomy during RC increases operative time and may improve DFS; however, the available evidence does not clearly support a consistent oncologic benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.