Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42655938›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2026

Large Scale Expansion of Organic Farming at Risk of Phosphorus Limitation in the Long Run.

Josephine Demay, Bruno Ringeval, Pietro Barbieri, Sylvain Pellerin, Thomas Nesme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Josephine DemayBordeaux Sciences Agro, University of Bordeaux, UMR 1391 ISPA, Gradignan, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5416-2601
Bruno RingevalINRAE, UMR 1391 ISPA, Villenave d'Ornon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8405-1304
Pietro BarbieriBordeaux Sciences Agro, University of Bordeaux, UMR 1391 ISPA, Gradignan, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3248-4487
Sylvain PellerinINRAE, UMR 1391 ISPA, Villenave d'Ornon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4388-8460
Thomas NesmeINRAE, UMR 1391 ISPA, Villenave d'Ornon, France.

Funding

Arvalis Institut du VegetalINRAE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Debates about the agronomic feasibility of feeding the world organically have often focused on potential nitrogen (N) limitations, overlooking the challenges raised by the availability of phosphorus (P) in soils. Here we address this missing piece by simulating, over a 100-year time span, a 100% organic world, in which mineral fertilizers are banned. We show that, in the short term, soil available P would barely limit organic crop production due to (i) existing soil P stocks, (ii) a replenishment of the available P pool by more stable pools, and (iii) a strong N limitation that reduces crop yields and consequently plant P demand. Conversely, in the long term (~100 years), the simulated 60% drop in cropland soil available P would result in a -12% reduction in cropland production globally, ranging from -4% in Eastern Europe to -29% in Latin America. This P limitation would be greater in places with high yields and a high proportion of legumes in crop rotations, highlighting the need to address N-P interactions simultaneously to design more sustainable food systems. The expansion of organic farming therefore runs the risk of slowly but surely depleting soil P unless measures are taken to recycle all P flows within the agri-food system.

Indexed as

Organic AgriculturePhosphorusSoilCrops, AgriculturalFertilizersNitrogenFertilizersNitrogenPhosphorusSoilmodelingnutrientsorganic farmingphosphorusproductionworld scale

Identifiers

PMID42655938
PMCPMC13519376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.