Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42655867›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners2026

Academic partnerships with clinical nurse scientist mentors improve the Doctor of Nursing Practice student experience.

Margaret A Gettis, Kelly Winter, Christina J Calamaro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Margaret A GettisChildren's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0001-9074-1184
Kelly WinterChildren's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0009-0000-6198-9121
Christina J CalamaroChildren's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0002-1735-4417

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractThe Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) degree has become firmly established as the terminal practice degree for advanced practice registered nurses in the United States. A defining component of the DNP curriculum requires students to implement a scholarly project that addresses a clinical problem and improves patient or system outcomes. This article describes the development and implementation of a structured clinical-academic partnership between a university-based DNP nurse anesthesia program and a pediatric health care organization in the southeastern United States. Central to this collaboration was the establishment of the clinical Nurse Scientist Mentor (NSM) role designed to bridge academic and clinical environments. To develop high-level DNP student projects, the NSM and academic faculty connected the DNP student-employees to projects that improved patient, clinical, or system outcomes. The experience in this report suggests that structured clinical-academic partnerships can strengthen the quality, relevance, and sustainability of DNP scholarly work. In addition, the NSM is an innovative and viable model that can be replicated in health care systems where DNP projects are being implemented.

Indexed as

Education, Nursing, GraduateMentorsStudents, NursingAcademiaCooperative BehaviorCurriculumHumansDNP educationDNP scholarly projectnurse scientist mentorstructured clinical-academic partnership

Identifiers

PMID42655867
PMCPMC13549453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.