ArticleVeterinary sciences2026
Suspected Type III Hypersensitivity Post-Inactivated Vaccination Leukocytoclastic Vasculitis in Two Sows.
Article in Veterinary sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This case report describes the investigation of two cases of cutaneous vasculitis in sows following vaccination. The herd was porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV)-stable, with routine PRRSV-1 and porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) sows' vaccination. Two sows developed red-to-purple macules on the udder, flanks, and hind limbs, occurring two and three days after vaccination, respectively. Diagnostic investigations included biochemistry, complete blood count, PCR, immunohistochemistry (IHC), serology, histopathology, Gram staining, and immunofluorescence (IF) to assess the involvement of type III hypersensitivity. Clinical examination and herd evaluation revealed no significant abnormalities. Both sows showed biochemistry results within the reference intervals. One sow had lymphocytosis. All PCR PCV2, PCV3 and PRRSV-1/2 on serum and IHC PCV2 conducted on skin biopsies were negative, although both animals were seropositive for PCV2. Histopathology revealed necrotizing leukocytoclastic vasculitis, and Gram staining detected no bacteria. IF failed to identify immune complex or complement deposition. However, type III hypersensitivity could not be excluded, as immune complexes are transient and biopsies were collected about 48 h after lesion onset. Overall, the findings support a vaccine-related adverse reaction. Vaccine adverse effects should therefore be considered in the differential diagnosis of cutaneous vasculitis in swine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.