ArticleVeterinary sciences2026
From Observation to Structured Reporting: Development and Preliminary Evaluation of an Online Animal Abuse Reporting System.
Article in Veterinary sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animal abuse and substandard animal care may be difficult to report when members of the public are uncertain about the seriousness of their observations, the competent authority, or the information needed for further assessment. This study aimed to develop and preliminarily evaluate a structured online reporting interface for suspected animal abuse and animal welfare concerns in Hungary. Two public online questionnaires assessed reporting-related knowledge, experiences, and preferences, and a separate professional questionnaire examined the experiences of actors involved in animal protection procedures. Based on these findings, the Hungarian legal context, and international reporting models, a browser-based prototype was developed and professionally tested by staff members of the National Food Chain Safety Office. Public respondents significantly differentiated between suspected criminal animal cruelty and substandard animal keeping: the police were selected more often for animal cruelty cases, whereas the notary was selected more often for substandard keeping cases (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.