ArticleVeterinary sciences2026
Feasibility of Remote Camera-Based Respiratory Motion Detection in Hospitalized Dogs Using the InsectEye Image-Analysis Application: A Pilot Study.
Article in Veterinary sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Noncontact camera-based detection of respiratory motion may support low-burden surveillance of hospitalized dogs, particularly at night. This pilot study evaluated the feasibility of the InsectEye image-analysis application for detecting visually identifiable respiratory motion in selected infrared nighttime video segments. An initial parameter optimization was performed using 13 one-minute video segments from nine dogs. The selected analysis conditions were subsequently evaluated in Experiment 1 using five 5 min video recordings from four dogs. Experiment 2 further assessed respiratory rate estimation using the same validation dataset. InsectEye-detected events were compared with visually confirmed respiratory motion using time-synchronized review. Two criteria were assessed: Both-only, requiring detection of both inspiratory- and expiratory-related motion, and Both+Either, accepting detection of either or both phases. Detection performance improved when the threshold was reduced from 10 to 8, particularly with the 256 × 120 mesh. The 256-120_15_8 condition yielded the highest mean detection rate (87.93 ± 1.87%), fewer false-negative events, and shorter continuous non-detection duration, although false-positive detections increased. The Both+Either criterion performed better than the Both-only criterion. These findings support the feasibility of camera-based respiratory motion detection under selected favorable conditions, but larger studies using physiological respiratory reference methods are required before clinical monitoring or alerting applications can be established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.