ReviewVeterinary sciences2026
Microbiome Engineering in Dairy Cattle: A Critical Review of Strategies for Disease Resistance, Productivity, and Sustainable Farming.
Review in Veterinary sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dairy production currently faces three converging challenges: the escalation of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), rising global food demand, and stricter regulatory requirements for reducing enteric methane emissions. This review evaluates probiotics, prebiotics, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), metagenomic tools, and Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)-based synthetic biology for dairy cow microbiome engineering, applying a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) 1-9 framework to assess the translational maturity of each strategy. The quantitative ranges below are from individual controlled or field studies unless indicated otherwise, and they represent the variation from study to study in different breeds, feeds, and stages of lactation, as well as in management systems. A systematic literature search was conducted across five major databases for the period 2020-2026. Applying the TRL framework revealed that conventional probiotics have reached field-ready maturity (TRL 7-8), boosting milk yield by 0.5-1.5 kg/d and lowering somatic cell counts by 20-40%. Calf gut maturation was found to be two to three weeks faster when FMT was used (TRL 5-6). Controlled conditions (TRL 2-3) showed a 10-20% reduction in methane emissions using engineered rumen bacteria (CRISPR). Intervention failures primarily stem from host-microbiome misalignment rather than microbial product design. The key translational gap is shifting from uniform herd-level to precision-guided individualized dosing. Standardized data infrastructure, regulatory frameworks for engineered biologics, and integration with precision livestock farming platforms are required to reduce antibiotic use and lower methane emissions within a One Health framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.